Random neuron firing, lame philosophy, literary pontificating, movies, sex, clothes & other femme stuff
Click here for the new and improved mikarrhea!
email michaela cooper
Archives
- August 2003
- September 2003
- October 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- Current Posts
great lynx to the poetry blogosphere
- Jim Behrle
- Miss Boynton
- Nathalie Chicha
- Chickee Chickston
- Malcolm Davidson
- Jordan Davis
- Ray Davis
- Katie Degentesh
- Ryan Fitzpatrick
- Drew Gardner
- Nada Gordon
- Noah Eli Gordon
- Old Hag
- Aaron Haspel
- Jack Kimball
- Crystal King
- Chris Lott
- Jonathan Mayhew
- Catherine Meng
- K. Silem Mohammad
- Brooke Nelson
- Maud Newton
- Aimee Nezhukumatathil
- Tim Peterson
- Nick Piombino
- Dorothea Salo
- Mike Snider
- Gary Sullivan
- Brian K. Stephans
- the new Eileen Tabios
- Terry Teachout
- Aaron Tieger
- Jean Vengua
- George M. Wallace
- Alli Warren
- Doc Watkin
- Michael Wells
- Stephanie Young
other nourishing lynx
- Agenda Bender
- Eric Alterman
- Atrios
- Bad Attitudes
- Dave Barry
- Belle de Jour
- Michael Bérubé
- billmon
- Bitter-girl
- blogdex
- Cousin Blogorroea
- boingboing
- Tom Burka
- carly
- Phil Carter
- Margaret Cho
- Juan Cole
- Ana Marie Cox
- Crooked Timber
- Evan Daze
- Dirty Whore
- Gregg Easterbrook
- Emily
- erosblog
- filchyboy
- Franny
- Michael Froomkin
- Debra Hyde
- Gnome-girl
- Michael Heileman
- Inkblots
- David Isenberg
- Joelle
- John and Belle
- Wendy K.
- Elizabeth Lane Lawley
- Richard Evans Lee
- Lawrence Lessig
- Meme List
- Chris Lydon
- Vicky McKay
- Josh Marshall
-
- Mika Monroe
- Chris Mooney
- The Nation
- Cynthia Rockwell
- Jim Romanesko
- Andrea Seigel
- Christine Selleck
- Arthur Silber
- Cornelia Smith
- Winston Smith
- Kevin Smokler
- Solipsistic Gazette
- Bob Somerby
- Halley Suitt
- Matthew Thomas
- tompaine.com
- Truth Laid Bear
- 2blowhards
- Michelle Thompson
- Bruce Umbaugh
- Daily Weasel
- Dave Winer
- Wonkette
evil lynx to monitor for safety's sake
- Glenn Reynolds
- Jeff Jarvis
- Zack Lynch
- Matthew Hoy
- Purple Balls
- bussorah
- John Ray
- Robert Musil
- William Whittle
Web Ring
< # Blogging Bitches ? >Thursday, October 23, 2003
Exterminate the brutes
Jonathan makes several strong arguments against the death penalty that can never be made too often. Another tack I like to take is a ghoulish species of reductio. Most supporters of the death penalty advance some version of one or more of the following arguments: the example of the death penalty deters potential criminals, it serves as the ultimate punishment for (the only one commensurate with) the worst forms of murder, and it prevents from doing so those likely to kill again. OK, cool. Then why don't we, instead, without anesthesia chainsaw off the arms and legs of convicted capital criminals?
Is it really likely that the set of those deterred from murder by the threat of being pillowed to eternal rest on an IV drip is significantly different from, or at all events greater than, the set of those deterred by the threat of mutilation by chainsaw and a miserable existence thereafter? Which would the reasonable person consider a more fearsome, more horrendously retributive, punishment? No arms, no legs--what's a murderous criminal gonna resort to (Black Knight: "It's just a flesh wound! Come back here! I'll bite your legs off!")?
Obviously, I'm not really in favor of such a change in policy. I've never met anyone who is. Most people say it's excessively barbaric. Exactly. That's what we death-penalty opponents and the citizens of the rest of the developed world think of our death penalty. So it's really just a matter of how your taste in horror has been socialized into you. The reason so many Americans support the death penalty is the very reason that so many Americans commit violent crimes: they're all Americans, a people socialized to believe that the anti-us must be eliminated, flushed away for good.
Hugo Bedau from Tufts has written some great books against the d.p. The ACLU position statement, which he also wrote, is here
Jonathan makes several strong arguments against the death penalty that can never be made too often. Another tack I like to take is a ghoulish species of reductio. Most supporters of the death penalty advance some version of one or more of the following arguments: the example of the death penalty deters potential criminals, it serves as the ultimate punishment for (the only one commensurate with) the worst forms of murder, and it prevents from doing so those likely to kill again. OK, cool. Then why don't we, instead, without anesthesia chainsaw off the arms and legs of convicted capital criminals?
Is it really likely that the set of those deterred from murder by the threat of being pillowed to eternal rest on an IV drip is significantly different from, or at all events greater than, the set of those deterred by the threat of mutilation by chainsaw and a miserable existence thereafter? Which would the reasonable person consider a more fearsome, more horrendously retributive, punishment? No arms, no legs--what's a murderous criminal gonna resort to (Black Knight: "It's just a flesh wound! Come back here! I'll bite your legs off!")?
Obviously, I'm not really in favor of such a change in policy. I've never met anyone who is. Most people say it's excessively barbaric. Exactly. That's what we death-penalty opponents and the citizens of the rest of the developed world think of our death penalty. So it's really just a matter of how your taste in horror has been socialized into you. The reason so many Americans support the death penalty is the very reason that so many Americans commit violent crimes: they're all Americans, a people socialized to believe that the anti-us must be eliminated, flushed away for good.
Hugo Bedau from Tufts has written some great books against the d.p. The ACLU position statement, which he also wrote, is here
Comments:
Post a Comment