Random neuron firing, lame philosophy, literary pontificating, movies, sex, clothes & other femme stuff
Click here for the new and improved mikarrhea!
email michaela cooper
Archives
- August 2003
- September 2003
- October 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- Current Posts
great lynx to the poetry blogosphere
- Jim Behrle
- Miss Boynton
- Nathalie Chicha
- Chickee Chickston
- Malcolm Davidson
- Jordan Davis
- Ray Davis
- Katie Degentesh
- Ryan Fitzpatrick
- Drew Gardner
- Nada Gordon
- Noah Eli Gordon
- Old Hag
- Aaron Haspel
- Jack Kimball
- Crystal King
- Chris Lott
- Jonathan Mayhew
- Catherine Meng
- K. Silem Mohammad
- Brooke Nelson
- Maud Newton
- Aimee Nezhukumatathil
- Tim Peterson
- Nick Piombino
- Dorothea Salo
- Mike Snider
- Gary Sullivan
- Brian K. Stephans
- the new Eileen Tabios
- Terry Teachout
- Aaron Tieger
- Jean Vengua
- George M. Wallace
- Alli Warren
- Doc Watkin
- Michael Wells
- Stephanie Young
other nourishing lynx
- Agenda Bender
- Eric Alterman
- Atrios
- Bad Attitudes
- Dave Barry
- Belle de Jour
- Michael Bérubé
- billmon
- Bitter-girl
- blogdex
- Cousin Blogorroea
- boingboing
- Tom Burka
- carly
- Phil Carter
- Margaret Cho
- Juan Cole
- Ana Marie Cox
- Crooked Timber
- Evan Daze
- Dirty Whore
- Gregg Easterbrook
- Emily
- erosblog
- filchyboy
- Franny
- Michael Froomkin
- Debra Hyde
- Gnome-girl
- Michael Heileman
- Inkblots
- David Isenberg
- Joelle
- John and Belle
- Wendy K.
- Elizabeth Lane Lawley
- Richard Evans Lee
- Lawrence Lessig
- Meme List
- Chris Lydon
- Vicky McKay
- Josh Marshall
-
- Mika Monroe
- Chris Mooney
- The Nation
- Cynthia Rockwell
- Jim Romanesko
- Andrea Seigel
- Christine Selleck
- Arthur Silber
- Cornelia Smith
- Winston Smith
- Kevin Smokler
- Solipsistic Gazette
- Bob Somerby
- Halley Suitt
- Matthew Thomas
- tompaine.com
- Truth Laid Bear
- 2blowhards
- Michelle Thompson
- Bruce Umbaugh
- Daily Weasel
- Dave Winer
- Wonkette
evil lynx to monitor for safety's sake
- Glenn Reynolds
- Jeff Jarvis
- Zack Lynch
- Matthew Hoy
- Purple Balls
- bussorah
- John Ray
- Robert Musil
- William Whittle
Web Ring
< # Blogging Bitches ? >Friday, December 05, 2003
I Think Gertrude Stein Was Onto Something
What, exactly, is a question? Seriously. Forget about Raymond Smullyan for a sec. (Raymond, some may remember, is a reoccurring character in Mikarrhea; for instance here, here, and here.) What is a question? Here's what the American Heritage entry at Dictionary.com says:
An expression of inquiry? An interrogative . . . ? Those words simply beg the, uh, question, depending as they do on a prior understanding of what a question is. (Webster falls into this hole too, really flailing his arms exuberantly: "That which is asked; inquiry; interrogatory; query.") "An expression . . . that invites or calls for a reply" is a much smarter attempt. Except by that definition hello would be a question, which seems weird to me. I mean, what exactly is hello asking? (Yes, I know many writers do customarily put a question mark after hello, but that still doesn't explain what "Hello" is asking.) Is Gesundheit! then a question and Danke schön it's reply? Hmmmm.
Anyway, what the hell is a reply? American Heritage again:
Ha. Ha.
What do answer and respond mean? Hmmm. Not by any chance "engage in an act of communication elicited by a question"? Aren't they embarrassed to be caught in this circle?
You would think that in a book he called Critique of Pure Reason, Kant might have addressed this "question." He takes as the most fundamental a priori intuitions those of space and time. Fine. We can't know a world except in space and time. We can't even think what it would be like to know a world except in space and time. But what about pure reason? Isn't it possible to conceive of purely reasoning without apprehending space and time? If we could, could we reason without knowing what a question and an answer are? Aren't they a priori intuitions even more fundamental than space and time?
Um, what's the question, again?
What, exactly, is a question? Seriously. Forget about Raymond Smullyan for a sec. (Raymond, some may remember, is a reoccurring character in Mikarrhea; for instance here, here, and here.) What is a question? Here's what the American Heritage entry at Dictionary.com says:
1. An expression of inquiry that invites or calls for a reply.
2. An interrogative sentence, phrase, or gesture.
An expression of inquiry? An interrogative . . . ? Those words simply beg the, uh, question, depending as they do on a prior understanding of what a question is. (Webster falls into this hole too, really flailing his arms exuberantly: "That which is asked; inquiry; interrogatory; query.") "An expression . . . that invites or calls for a reply" is a much smarter attempt. Except by that definition hello would be a question, which seems weird to me. I mean, what exactly is hello asking? (Yes, I know many writers do customarily put a question mark after hello, but that still doesn't explain what "Hello" is asking.) Is Gesundheit! then a question and Danke schön it's reply? Hmmmm.
Anyway, what the hell is a reply? American Heritage again:
# To give an answer in speech or writing.
# To respond by an action or gesture.
Ha. Ha.
What do answer and respond mean? Hmmm. Not by any chance "engage in an act of communication elicited by a question"? Aren't they embarrassed to be caught in this circle?
You would think that in a book he called Critique of Pure Reason, Kant might have addressed this "question." He takes as the most fundamental a priori intuitions those of space and time. Fine. We can't know a world except in space and time. We can't even think what it would be like to know a world except in space and time. But what about pure reason? Isn't it possible to conceive of purely reasoning without apprehending space and time? If we could, could we reason without knowing what a question and an answer are? Aren't they a priori intuitions even more fundamental than space and time?
Um, what's the question, again?
Comments:
Post a Comment