Random neuron firing, lame philosophy, literary pontificating, movies, sex, clothes & other femme stuff
Click here for the new and improved mikarrhea!
email michaela cooper
Archives
- August 2003
- September 2003
- October 2003
- November 2003
- December 2003
- January 2004
- February 2004
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- Current Posts
great lynx to the poetry blogosphere
- Jim Behrle
- Miss Boynton
- Nathalie Chicha
- Chickee Chickston
- Malcolm Davidson
- Jordan Davis
- Ray Davis
- Katie Degentesh
- Ryan Fitzpatrick
- Drew Gardner
- Nada Gordon
- Noah Eli Gordon
- Old Hag
- Aaron Haspel
- Jack Kimball
- Crystal King
- Chris Lott
- Jonathan Mayhew
- Catherine Meng
- K. Silem Mohammad
- Brooke Nelson
- Maud Newton
- Aimee Nezhukumatathil
- Tim Peterson
- Nick Piombino
- Dorothea Salo
- Mike Snider
- Gary Sullivan
- Brian K. Stephans
- the new Eileen Tabios
- Terry Teachout
- Aaron Tieger
- Jean Vengua
- George M. Wallace
- Alli Warren
- Doc Watkin
- Michael Wells
- Stephanie Young
other nourishing lynx
- Agenda Bender
- Eric Alterman
- Atrios
- Bad Attitudes
- Dave Barry
- Belle de Jour
- Michael Bérubé
- billmon
- Bitter-girl
- blogdex
- Cousin Blogorroea
- boingboing
- Tom Burka
- carly
- Phil Carter
- Margaret Cho
- Juan Cole
- Ana Marie Cox
- Crooked Timber
- Evan Daze
- Dirty Whore
- Gregg Easterbrook
- Emily
- erosblog
- filchyboy
- Franny
- Michael Froomkin
- Debra Hyde
- Gnome-girl
- Michael Heileman
- Inkblots
- David Isenberg
- Joelle
- John and Belle
- Wendy K.
- Elizabeth Lane Lawley
- Richard Evans Lee
- Lawrence Lessig
- Meme List
- Chris Lydon
- Vicky McKay
- Josh Marshall
-
- Mika Monroe
- Chris Mooney
- The Nation
- Cynthia Rockwell
- Jim Romanesko
- Andrea Seigel
- Christine Selleck
- Arthur Silber
- Cornelia Smith
- Winston Smith
- Kevin Smokler
- Solipsistic Gazette
- Bob Somerby
- Halley Suitt
- Matthew Thomas
- tompaine.com
- Truth Laid Bear
- 2blowhards
- Michelle Thompson
- Bruce Umbaugh
- Daily Weasel
- Dave Winer
- Wonkette
evil lynx to monitor for safety's sake
- Glenn Reynolds
- Jeff Jarvis
- Zack Lynch
- Matthew Hoy
- Purple Balls
- bussorah
- John Ray
- Robert Musil
- William Whittle
Web Ring
< # Blogging Bitches ? >Thursday, April 15, 2004
Should we stay or should we go?
I readily admit I don't swim as far out as many bloggers in the swells of Iraq analysis, but I do take a daily casual dip in the shallows. It suddenly struck me today as weird that I haven't seen any discussion of using the opportunity of our military occupation to organize and, along with sufficient legitimate U.N. observers, supervise a sweeping [isn't that the usual adjective?] Iraqi referendum just on the U.S. presence (nevermind the constitution of the Iraqi government). Of course, logistically a referendum would be difficult and expensive to pull together and conduct openly and fairly. But it's certainly not impossible. Would it really cost us more in the long run to hold soon a legitimate nationwide vote on our presence than to continue sluicing money into our military approach, in the dark about the will of the people? Sure, extremist parties might threaten to boycott the polls. But mightn't we come up with some sort of incentive to vote that would be difficult for non-extremists to turn down (vouchers for food or some govt benefit, plus a credible guarantee of voters' security and anonymity)? Then the world would have at least a version of a sense of the Iraqi people's voice. The question could be fairly simple and straightforward:
I was tempted to add a question about the form the Iraqi govt should ultimately take, but I think that a simple referendum on the desirability of our presence/assistance should be the first step.
Maybe this is pie-in-the-sky thinking.
I've never actually spent time thinking about a pie in the sky.
I readily admit I don't swim as far out as many bloggers in the swells of Iraq analysis, but I do take a daily casual dip in the shallows. It suddenly struck me today as weird that I haven't seen any discussion of using the opportunity of our military occupation to organize and, along with sufficient legitimate U.N. observers, supervise a sweeping [isn't that the usual adjective?] Iraqi referendum just on the U.S. presence (nevermind the constitution of the Iraqi government). Of course, logistically a referendum would be difficult and expensive to pull together and conduct openly and fairly. But it's certainly not impossible. Would it really cost us more in the long run to hold soon a legitimate nationwide vote on our presence than to continue sluicing money into our military approach, in the dark about the will of the people? Sure, extremist parties might threaten to boycott the polls. But mightn't we come up with some sort of incentive to vote that would be difficult for non-extremists to turn down (vouchers for food or some govt benefit, plus a credible guarantee of voters' security and anonymity)? Then the world would have at least a version of a sense of the Iraqi people's voice. The question could be fairly simple and straightforward:
The United States military should either:
- pull out of Iraq completely as soon as possible by [June 30, or whatever]?
- continue its role in maintaining Iraqi security and inhibiting internecine violence until [some date arrives or condition is met] and then pull out
I was tempted to add a question about the form the Iraqi govt should ultimately take, but I think that a simple referendum on the desirability of our presence/assistance should be the first step.
Maybe this is pie-in-the-sky thinking.
I've never actually spent time thinking about a pie in the sky.
Comments:
Post a Comment